Ship profile · flagged in Netherlands. Browse upcoming sailings and route previews for this ship.
Image via Wikimedia CommonsReviewer read
Nieuw Statendam rates higher overall than 71% of the ships we track. Ship quality is its strongest showing. The weak spot is entertainment.
Why reviewers choose it
Higher than 87% of ships · 408 ratings
Higher than 85% of ships · 752 ratings
Higher than 82% of ships · 728 ratings
Higher than 77% of ships · 247 ratings
The one caution
7.5out of 10 for entertainment
Higher than only 45% of ships. The typical ship scores 7.60.
Nine are good without being remarkable: ship quality, cabins, dining, fitness, public areas, embarkation, service, value and disembarkation. They rate higher than 66% to 87% of ships.
Two fall below the fleet: activities (higher than only 46% of ships) and entertainment (higher than only 45% of ships).
Family falls below the fleet too, but only 69 people scored it, so treat it as a hint.
Cabin grade does matter here. Oceanview rates 9.2 and suite rates 8.7, across 349 cabin ratings.
Reviewers named 12 places by name. These 3 are the ones where knowing changes anything — the other 8 are all liked by 65% to 95% of the people who mentioned them.
Seniors (55 of 68), first-time cruisers (19 of 21), couples (10 of 10) and solo travelers (7 of 10).
No group described it as a poor fit.
The mark on each bar is where the typical ship sits.
| Category | Rating | Compared with other ships | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ship quality | 9.3 | Higher than 87% | 408 ratings · useful |
| Disembarkation | 9.0 | Higher than 66% | 408 ratings · useful |
| Cabins | 8.9 | Higher than 85% | 752 ratings · broad |
| Service | 8.9 | Higher than 73% | 715 ratings · broad |
| Embarkation | 8.7 | Higher than 74% | 727 ratings · broad |
| Dining | 8.3 | Higher than 82% | 728 ratings · broad |
| Public areas | 8.3 | Higher than 76% | 315 ratings · useful |
| Fitness | 7.8 | Higher than 77% | 247 ratings · useful |
| Activities | 7.8 | Higher than only 46% | 408 ratings · useful |
| Entertainment | 7.5 | Higher than only 45% | 696 ratings · broad |
| Value | 7.2 | Higher than 70% | 308 ratings · useful |
| Family | 6.4 | Higher than only 22% | 69 ratings · limited |
857 published reviews · 284 from the last three years · 6,162 individual comments read.
On the chart
Inside $2,609 · Ocean view $2,719 · Balcony $3,019 · Suite $4,059 per person
Inside $799 · Ocean view $1,499 · Balcony $1,499 · Suite $3,399 per person
Inside $699 · Ocean view $999 · Balcony $949 · Suite $1,499 per person
Inside $1,574 · Ocean view $1,974 · Balcony $2,054 · Suite $3,254 per person
Inside $1,199 · Ocean view $1,399 · Balcony $1,549 · Suite $2,499 per person
Inside $1,649 · Ocean view $1,889 · Balcony $2,129 · Suite $3,329 per person
Inside $799 · Ocean view $899 · Balcony $1,049 · Suite $1,599 per person
Inside $1,449 · Ocean view $1,669 · Balcony $2,029 · Suite $2,929 per person
Inside $1,439 · Ocean view $1,709 · Balcony $2,159 · Suite $2,969 per person
Inside $799 · Ocean view $949 · Balcony $1,199 · Suite $1,649 per person
Inside $1,489 · Ocean view $1,719 · Balcony $2,259 · Suite $3,379 per person
Inside $899 · Ocean view $999 · Balcony $1,299 · Suite $1,749 per person
Inside $1,714 · Ocean view $1,984 · Balcony $2,794 · Suite $4,064 per person
Inside $719 · Ocean view $849 · Balcony $1,129 · Suite $1,779 per person
Inside $839 · Ocean view $969 · Balcony $1,039 · Suite $1,899 per person
Inside $3,079 · Ocean view $3,669 · Balcony $3,839 · Suite $5,609 per person
Inside $3,284 · Ocean view $3,884 · Balcony $4,434 · Suite $6,054 per person
Inside $2,554 · Ocean view $3,054 · Balcony $3,164 · Suite $8,424 per person
Inside $5,069 · Ocean view $6,119 · Balcony $6,599 · Suite $15,819 per person
Inside $2,629 · Ocean view $3,129 · Balcony $3,639 · Suite $4,199 per person
Inside $5,144 · Ocean view $6,044 · Balcony $8,014 per person
Inside $2,794 · Ocean view $3,394 · Balcony $3,894 per person
Inside $5,064 · Ocean view $6,254 · Balcony $7,824 per person
Inside $2,769 · Ocean view $3,219 · Balcony $3,619 per person
.jpg?width=1280)
.jpg){kind=link}